AJ,

<< It looks like TB is sending the TOP command, which your sever doesn't
support. I ended up adding it my self so I could test with it. When I get a
chance I'll rebundle it and post it back to attachments. >>

Very cool, thanks.  While you're at it, how about adding support for cancels
?

--
Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com

Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:

> Very cool, thanks.  While you're at it, how about adding support for
> cancels ?

I'll see what I can do.

-AJ Marknette

AJ,

<< I'll see what I can do. >>

I was just joking - please don't spend any time on that on my account.

--
Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com

Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
>
> I was just joking - please don't spend any time on that on my account.

I know you were joking. But I have looked at adding cancel support. But
can't get any good info online how to implement it. Any ideas?

-AJ Marknette

AJ,

<< I know you were joking. But I have looked at adding cancel support. But
can't get any good info online how to implement it. Any ideas? >>

I thought the RFC for the NNTP protocol had it, but I'd have to check.

--
Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com

AJ


As Tim says the RFC's have it - I've attached the two relevant ones I know of.

To me the problem isn't so much cancelling A message but what you do about replies to that message that originated between it being downloaded and the cancellation being downloaded, and also who really is allowed to cancel it.

Also what happens if any news client hasn't implemented cancel.


Roy Lambert

Roy Lambert wrote:

> AJ
>
>
> As Tim says the RFC's have it - I've attached the two relevant ones I
> know of.
>
> To me the problem isn't so much cancelling A message but what you do
> about replies to that message that originated between it being
> downloaded and the cancellation being downloaded, and also who really
> is allowed to cancel it.
>
> Also what happens if any news client hasn't implemented cancel.
>
>
> Roy Lambert

Thanks.

--AJ Marknette

>
> Very cool, thanks.  While you're at it, how about adding support for
> cancels ?

See Binaries Group

-- AJ Marknette