Icon View Thread

The following is the text of the current message along with any replies.
Messages 1 to 5 of 5 total
Thread New EWB controls
Fri, Sep 1 2017 10:41 AMPermanent Link

Ivan Mihailov

Hello Tim,

Do you have any plans to add new EWB controls in the near future,
for example versions 2.08 or 2.09?
There is no information in the roadmap section.
For my next project I definitely need а treeview control and lookup combobox.

Best regards,

Ivan
Tue, Sep 5 2017 12:58 PMPermanent Link

Tim Young [Elevate Software]

Elevate Software, Inc.

Avatar

Email timyoung@elevatesoft.com

Ivan,

<< Do you have any plans to add new EWB controls in the near future, for example versions 2.08 or 2.09? >>

Yes, I will be moving back on to completing the rest of the missing controls after 2.07 is out.  That will be the primary goal until the code editor improvements are finally implemented in a 2.50 release (these are waiting on some incremental compilation improvements in the compiler).

Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com
Wed, Sep 6 2017 3:20 AMPermanent Link

Matthew Jones

Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:

> code editor improvements

The current improvements are very nice though anyway. Ctrl-clicking types etc to jump to them is great. My only wish, of course, is that a compile fail shouldn't stop it working if at all possible. Use the partial type tree anyway. Typically I am on some line and do a "myVar := object." and then I want to check a type to get the right property name.

--

Matthew Jones
Wed, Sep 6 2017 6:03 AMPermanent Link

Uli Becker

Matthew,

+1

Uli
Wed, Sep 6 2017 11:54 AMPermanent Link

Tim Young [Elevate Software]

Elevate Software, Inc.

Avatar

Email timyoung@elevatesoft.com

Matthew,

<< The current improvements are very nice though anyway. Ctrl-clicking types etc to jump to them is great. My only wish, of course, is that a compile fail shouldn't stop it working if at all possible. Use the partial type tree anyway. Typically I am on some line and do a "myVar := object." and then I want to check a type to get the right property name. >>

Yeah, I was just thinking about this yesterday when I typed that response.  I have to double-check to see if I'm artificially stopping on *any* error, or just when it can't get to the proper unit because of an error in a referencing unit.  There definitely needs to be a way to "just do the best that it can do".

Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com
Image