Icon View Thread

The following is the text of the current message along with any replies.
Messages 1 to 5 of 5 total
Thread JOINs
Thu, May 23 2013 10:33 AMPermanent Link

Roy Lambert

NLH Associates

Team Elevate Team Elevate

I know that theoretically tests other than = can be applied to a JOIN condition. How often does anyone do so?

Roy Lambert
Fri, May 24 2013 7:49 AMPermanent Link

Matthew Jones

I don't think I ever have, but then I'm not a particularly big or fancy user of
databases.

/Matthew Jones/
Fri, May 24 2013 8:47 AMPermanent Link

Raul

Team Elevate Team Elevate

I don't recall ever using anything other than =

I've used the WHERE clause with some other DB's before but even then it
was = again for key comparison and rest was something else (same as JOIN
WHERE clause).


Raul

On 5/23/2013 10:33 AM, Roy Lambert wrote:
> I know that theoretically tests other than = can be applied to a JOIN condition. How often does anyone do so?
>
> Roy Lambert
>
Fri, May 24 2013 11:44 AMPermanent Link

Fernando Dias

Team Elevate Team Elevate

Roy,

It's not something I had often used, but there were a few times that I did use <>, when there is the need to get pairs of values with distinct values, like this:

(1,2)
(1,3)
(2,1)
(2,3)
(3,1)
(3,2)

--
Fernando Dias
[Team Elevate]
Sun, May 26 2013 3:28 AMPermanent Link

Roy Lambert

NLH Associates

Team Elevate Team Elevate

Thanks you lot. Its for specifying joins in my end user query generator. The current version allows the programmer setting up the spec to use anything but I have only use = so its a bit of simplification.

Roy Lambert
Image