Icon View Thread

The following is the text of the current message along with any replies.
Messages 1 to 2 of 2 total
Thread DBISAM / ElevateDB units precedence
Sat, Apr 7 2007 9:46 AMPermanent Link

Roy Lambert

NLH Associates

Team Elevate Team Elevate

Tim

I think we're going to need some advice about ElevateDB and DBISAM crossovers for those (hopefully) rare occasions where there is a problem.

I've just encountered my second one (lpPessimistic) and in this case it seems to be solved by moving edbcomps before DBISAMTb, DBISAMCn,

lt worries me because I don't know if there are deeper implications. The last one was Session and I'm not certain about the positioning for the stuff but I think it was the same.

Roy Lambert
Mon, Apr 9 2007 8:37 PMPermanent Link

Tim Young [Elevate Software]

Elevate Software, Inc.

Avatar

Email timyoung@elevatesoft.com

Roy,

<< I think we're going to need some advice about ElevateDB and DBISAM
crossovers for those (hopefully) rare occasions where there is a problem.

I've just encountered my second one (lpPessimistic) and in this case it
seems to be solved by moving edbcomps before DBISAMTb, DBISAMCn,

lt worries me because I don't know if there are deeper implications. The
last one was Session and I'm not certain about the positioning for the stuff
but I think it was the same. >>

Just preface the references with the proper unit (dbisamtb or edbcomps).
That way you don't need to rely on the unit reference ordering in the USES
clause.

--
Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com

Image