Icon View Thread

The following is the text of the current message along with any replies.
Messages 1 to 5 of 5 total
Thread reserved names?
Fri, Jul 24 2009 3:24 PMPermanent Link

"Lucian Radulescu"
Hi,

I am upgrading an application (kind of source safe app) and some of the
tables are named like this: USERS, PROJECTS, FILES, HISTORY, LABELS.

Any worries?


TIA,
Lucian
Sat, Jul 25 2009 3:46 AMPermanent Link

Roy Lambert

NLH Associates

Team Elevate Team Elevate

Lucian


Apart from getting yourself confused you mean Smiley The system tables are in a different database so they won't be interfered with by yours. However, to stop confusing yourself I suggest you try and avoid using names that are used for the system files eg I renamed my Users table to Staff.

Roy Lambert [Team Elevate]
Sun, Jul 26 2009 4:53 PMPermanent Link

"Lucian Radulescu"
> so they won't be interfered with

I heard stuff like this before Smile I hope it really stays like that.


> avoid using names that are used for the system files eg I renamed my
> Users table to Staff.

Funny thing, at the office we have a table called "setup" for users. I
dislike that and for my own apps I don't actually want to call "Users"
anything else than "Users", because it's actually storing users (not
staff like in your case, maybe).

I'd rather like the system tables being called in such a manner so that
they'll never interfere with my stuff, for example "$sys$_users" ...
but I guess it's too late for that now .


--
Thanks,
Lucian
Mon, Jul 27 2009 4:24 PMPermanent Link

Tim Young [Elevate Software]

Elevate Software, Inc.

Avatar

Email timyoung@elevatesoft.com

Lucian,

<< I am upgrading an application (kind of source safe app) and some of the
tables are named like this: USERS, PROJECTS, FILES, HISTORY, LABELS. >>

No.  The SQL parsing is always contextual and related to the current
database, so you shouldn't have any problem naming the tables anything that
you want.

--
Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com

Tue, Jul 28 2009 8:16 PMPermanent Link

"Lucian Radulescu"
> No.  The SQL parsing is always contextual and related to the current
> database, so you shouldn't have any problem naming the tables
> anything that you want.


Allrightieeee!

--
Thx,
Lucian
Image