Support Forums - View Thread

View Thread

The following is the text of the current message along with any replies.

Messages 11 to 14 of 14 total

Select into temporary table

Thu, Jan 10 2013 7:25 AM	Permanent Link
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com	Roy, << But SELECT ... INTO ... is much nicer <vbg> >> Not when it's used for something else (SELECT INTO <variable> with SQL/PSM). Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com
Thu, Jan 10 2013 8:52 AM	Permanent Link
Roy Lambert NLH Associates Team Elevate	Tim ><< But SELECT ... INTO ... is much nicer <vbg> >> > >Not when it's used for something else (SELECT INTO <variable> with SQL/PSM). > Sorry but that's cheating! You only built that into SQL/PSM well after I'd had a moan about SELECT INTO disappearing, and I suspect that you did it deliberately just so you had an excuse not to revert back to the better format ..... and I've just realised its a totally irrelevant red herring you naughty little boy Roy
Fri, Jan 11 2013 10:41 AM	Permanent Link
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com	Roy, << Sorry but that's cheating! You only built that into SQL/PSM well after I'd had a moan about SELECT INTO disappearing, and I suspect that you did it deliberately just so you had an excuse not to revert back to the better format ..... and I've just realised its a totally irrelevant red herring you naughty little boy >> I could be losing my mind, but I'm pretty sure that if you look at my past responses you'll see that I specifically stated that the reason for not using INTO in the old, DBISAM way was that I was planning on using it for SQL/PSM. Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com
Sat, Jan 12 2013 8:03 AM	Permanent Link
Roy Lambert NLH Associates Team Elevate	Tim ><< Sorry but that's cheating! You only built that into SQL/PSM well after >I'd had a moan about SELECT INTO disappearing, and I suspect that you did it >deliberately just so you had an excuse not to revert back to the better >format ..... and I've just realised its a totally irrelevant red herring you >naughty little boy >> > > > >I could be losing my mind, but I'm pretty sure that if you look at my past >responses you'll see that I specifically stated that the reason for not >using INTO in the old, DBISAM way was that I was planning on using it for >SQL/PSM. I refuse to comment on your state of mind but have been told that Java and such things can do that to you. However, for now, time availability precluding me re-reading all posts to see if you did indeed say that, I will trust your memory. Roy

« Previous Page	Page 2 of 2
Jump to Page: 1 2