Hello,
i must say i'm complete new to JS so i'm lost.....

i try to use the RemobjectSdk and maybe Databstrcat with EWB

so i have the *js from Remobejct but i dont find a way how to declare in EWB

the needed classes like:

JS code:
// Service: NewService
function NewService(__channel, __message, __service_name) {
 RemObjects.SDK.ROService.call(this, __channel, __message, __service_name);
 this.fServiceName = this.fServiceName || __service_name || "NewService";
};


NewService.prototype.TestDataFromServer = function(
   __success, __error) {
   try {
       var msg = this.fMessage.clone();
       msg.initialize(this.fServiceName, "TestDataFromServer");
       msg.finalize();
       this.fChannel.dispatch(msg, function (__message) {
      var __result = __message.read("Result", "WideString");
           __success(
      __result
      );
       }, __error);

   } catch (e) {
       __error(msg, e);
   };
};

can anybody point me to the right direction?

Thank Fritz

Hi Friedrich - I'll try and get an update of my RO demo uploaded later
tonight.

The original version required a kludge (it's in binaries) but the recent
changes Tim made mean that it's possible to directly reference the
external RO objects.

Cheers, Bob



On 21/02/2012 14:49, Friedrich Westermann wrote:
> Hello,
> i must say i'm complete new to JS so i'm lost.....
>
> i try to use the RemobjectSdk and maybe Databstrcat with EWB
>
> so i have the *js from Remobejct but i dont find a way how to declare in EWB
>
> the needed classes like:
>
> JS code:
> // Service: NewService
> function NewService(__channel, __message, __service_name) {
>    RemObjects.SDK.ROService.call(this, __channel, __message, __service_name);
>    this.fServiceName = this.fServiceName || __service_name || "NewService";
> };
>
>
> NewService.prototype.TestDataFromServer = function(
>    __success, __error) {
>      try {
>          var msg = this.fMessage.clone();
>          msg.initialize(this.fServiceName, "TestDataFromServer");
>          msg.finalize();
>          this.fChannel.dispatch(msg, function (__message) {
>       var __result = __message.read("Result", "WideString");
>            __success(
>       __result
>       );
>          }, __error);
>
>      } catch (e) {
>          __error(msg, e);
>      };
> };
>
> can anybody point me to the right direction?
>
> Thank Fritz
>

Hello Bob,

thank you a lot.  
It i a interesting time..... all the new things to learn


Fritz


Bob Devine wrote:

> Hi Friedrich - I'll try and get an update of my RO demo uploaded
> later tonight.
>
> The original version required a kludge (it's in binaries) but the
> recent changes Tim made mean that it's possible to directly reference
> the external RO objects.
>
> Cheers, Bob
>
>

Hi Fritz

I've just posted an update in the demos group. It requires references to
the external JS files RemObjectsSDK.js and NewLibrary_intf.js which are
in the Javascript folder. I've also posted the server I used - note that
it has the DefaultFile property of the ROJavaScriptHttpDispatcher set to
rotest3.html and that the files are served from the \html folder.

Cheers, Bob


On 21/02/2012 16:08, Friedrich Westermann wrote:
> Hello Bob,
>
> thank you a lot.
> It i a interesting time..... all the new things to learn
>
>
> Fritz
>
>
> Bob Devine wrote:
>
>> Hi Friedrich - I'll try and get an update of my RO demo uploaded
>> later tonight.
>>
>> The original version required a kludge (it's in binaries) but the
>> recent changes Tim made mean that it's possible to directly reference
>> the external RO objects.
>>
>> Cheers, Bob
>>
>>
>

Hi Bob

the ROSDKUtils is missing if you want to share.....

Thanks again

Fritz



Bob Devine wrote:

> Hi Fritz
>
> I've just posted an update in the demos group. It requires references
> to the external JS files RemObjectsSDK.js and NewLibrary_intf.js
> which are in the Javascript folder. I've also posted the server I
> used - note that it has the DefaultFile property of the
> ROJavaScriptHttpDispatcher set to rotest3.html and that the files are
> served from the \html folder.
>
> Cheers, Bob
>

Ah, sorry - forgot about that! I've uploaded it to demos.

Cheers, Bob


On 21/02/2012 17:29, Friedrich Westermann wrote:
> Hi Bob
>
> the ROSDKUtils is missing if you want to share.....
>
> Thanks again
>
> Fritz
>
>
>
> Bob Devine wrote:
>
>> Hi Fritz
>>
>> I've just posted an update in the demos group. It requires references
>> to the external JS files RemObjectsSDK.js and NewLibrary_intf.js
>> which are in the Javascript folder. I've also posted the server I
>> used - note that it has the DefaultFile property of the
>> ROJavaScriptHttpDispatcher set to rotest3.html and that the files are
>> served from the \html folder.
>>
>> Cheers, Bob
>>

Hello Bob

thanks, it works!!
now i have to got my brain around all these "new" stuff



Greetings Fritz




> Ah, sorry - forgot about that! I've uploaded it to demos.
>
> Cheers, Bob
>

That's great - I also have a working Data Abstract demo that I need to
tidy up a bit - I'll try and get it uploaded tomorrow.

Cheers, Bob


On 21/02/2012 18:56, Friedrich Westermann wrote:
>
> Hello Bob
>
> thanks, it works!!
> now i have to got my brain around all these "new" stuff
>
>
>
> Greetings Fritz
>
>
>
>
>> Ah, sorry - forgot about that! I've uploaded it to demos.
>>
>> Cheers, Bob
>>

Hello Bob,

sorry for ask again......

for me the hole js is a "black box" so if you have a example for Data
Abstract these would be great.

Thank Fritz



> That's great - I also have a working Data Abstract demo that I need
> to tidy up a bit - I'll try and get it uploaded tomorrow.
>
> Cheers, Bob

Hi Fritz - sorry, got a bit swamped and didn't get around to cleaning up
the demo. I've just posted it - you'll just need to modify your copy of
the DA Sample Server found in the DA demos.

The EWB client doesn't display the datatable in a grid - just the
fieldnames. I created a descendent TGrid that did display the data, but
have decided instead to create a class that encapsulates a datatable and
a dataset, and syncs edits on the dataset.

I've decided to wait until Tim has finished the dataset editing etc
before pushing on with this. At some point in the future hopefully Tim
will make the datatable bindable to the grid, but I'd imagine he's got
enough on his plate for a while yet.

Let me know if you have any problems/questions...

Cheers, Bob


On 28/02/2012 16:52, Friedrich Westermann wrote:
> Hello Bob,
>
> sorry for ask again......
>
> for me the hole js is a "black box" so if you have a example for Data
> Abstract these would be great.
>
> Thank Fritz
>
>
>
>> That's great - I also have a working Data Abstract demo that I need
>> to tidy up a bit - I'll try and get it uploaded tomorrow.
>>
>> Cheers, Bob
>