![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » Elevate Web Builder Technical Support » Support Forums » Elevate Web Builder General » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 7 of 7 total |
![]() |
Wed, Jul 22 2015 8:48 PM | Permanent Link |
Steve Gill | Hi Tim,
I am currently using TLink as menu items in my web apps. I have noticed something odd is happening when I make an unrelated change on a form. TLink seems to lose the connection to the OnClick event. The events are still there and all I need to do is go into the object inspector and double-click on the OnClick event for each TLink to bring them back. The worst thing is it doesn't happen all the time - it's intermittent. = Steve |
Wed, Jul 22 2015 9:59 PM | Permanent Link |
Raul Globestar Systems ![]() | On 7/22/2015 8:48 PM, Steve Gill wrote:
> Hi Tim, > I am currently using TLink as menu items in my web apps. > I have noticed something odd is happening when I make an unrelated change on a form. TLink seems to lose the connection to the OnClick event. > The events are still there and all I need to do is go into the object inspector and double-click on the OnClick event for each TLink to bring them back. > The worst thing is it doesn't happen all the time - it's intermittent. Are you by any chance modifying any code in the interface section that IDE maintains ? I found it can cause issues like this. For example i can duplicate missing event issue like this fairly consistently : 1. new project, based on TForm, 2. add TButton and TLink 3. add OnClick handler for both and fill in event implemention with something ( i used Showmessage dialog for both). 4. Go into the form interface section where Button1 and Link1 are defined and enter something invalid between component declartions and event ones. I did this (note the two "a" in there ) : TForm1 = class(TForm) Button1: TButton; a Link1: TLink; a procedure Button1Click(Sender: TObject); procedure Link1Click(Sender: TObject); 5. When you now hit save then OnClick handlers are removed from object inspector for both TButton and TLink. Raul |
Thu, Jul 23 2015 12:51 AM | Permanent Link |
Steve Gill | Hi Raul,
<< Are you by any chance modifying any code in the interface section that IDE maintains ? I found it can cause issues like this. >> Yes, I'm pretty sure I have added new units to the Uses clause, and new methods to the Private/Public sections. = Steve |
Thu, Jul 23 2015 9:21 AM | Permanent Link |
Raul Globestar Systems ![]() | On 7/23/2015 12:51 AM, Steve Gill wrote:
> Yes, I'm pretty sure I have added new units to the Uses clause, and new methods to the Private/Public sections. I generally had not noticed these issues when using regular private and public sections of a class (only the ide maintained one befopre the private section). However i did run some more tests and as long as you have multiple uncompilable entries it causes issues. Having this in the class private and public results in lost handlers again: private { Private declarations } myVar1 myVar2:integer; myVar3 public { Public declarations } myVar4 myVar5 If i have less entries or do not have not have the valid variable definition in the middle there it does not cause the issue. Second issue (related but separate) is that if you add event handler now (without fixing the private/public section first) it inserts it in the wrong place - for example inside the existing onclick handler (but can be in other places as well). I ended up with this for example: procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject); begin showmessage('button'); procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject); begin end; end; Raul |
Thu, Jul 23 2015 5:55 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Steve,
<< I have noticed something odd is happening when I make an unrelated change on a form. TLink seems to lose the connection to the OnClick event. >> This will be fixed in 2.01. The issue occurs when you try to save the form/unit and there is a compilation/parsing issue in the implementation section of the unit. 2.01 changes the way that EWB looks for empty event handlers and stops using the implementation section for determining their "existence". Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Jul 23 2015 11:59 PM | Permanent Link |
Steve Gill | << ....If i have less entries or do not have not have the valid variable
definition in the middle there it does not cause the issue. Second issue (related but separate) is that if you add event handler now (without fixing the private/public section first) it inserts it in the wrong place - for example inside the existing onclick handler (but can be in other places as well)......>> Keeps us on our toes, I guess. ![]() |
Thu, Jul 23 2015 11:59 PM | Permanent Link |
Steve Gill | << This will be fixed in 2.01. The issue occurs when you try to save the form/unit and there is a compilation/parsing issue in the implementation section of the unit. 2.01 changes the way that EWB looks for empty event handlers and stops using the implementation section for determining their "existence". >>
Thanks Tim. |
This web page was last updated on Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 10:19 AM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2023 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |