Login ProductsSalesSupportDownloadsAbout |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM Client/Server » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 4 of 4 total |
Application in a cloud |
Tue, Mar 10 2015 4:39 PM | Permanent Link |
Jose Eduardo Helminsky HPro Informatica | I am with a new situation: Deploy an application in the cloud.
My doubt is so simples, should I use C/S model or let the user access the files directly F/S ? There are around 10 users and they will connect using TS in the same server (application + data) Any tips/comments ? |
Mon, Mar 16 2015 10:03 AM | Permanent Link |
Raul Team Elevate | On 3/10/2015 4:39 PM, Jose Eduardo Helminsky wrote:
> I am with a new situation: Deploy an application in the cloud. > My doubt is so simples, should I use C/S model or let the user access the files directly F/S ? > There are around 10 users and they will connect using TS in the same server (application + data) > Any tips/comments ? Either will be fine in this case - I'd go c/s as i think it's more flexible in this case (you're already on the internet). This way if there is ever a chance of getting remote users or having to move dbsrvr to another box you'd be all set. Raul |
Mon, Mar 16 2015 10:42 AM | Permanent Link |
Jose Eduardo Helminsky HPro Informatica | Raul wrote:
<< Either will be fine in this case - I'd go c/s as i think it's more flexible in this case (you're already on the internet). This way if there is ever a chance of getting remote users or having to move dbsrvr to another box you'd be all set. >> For me does not matter because it is very easy (just one line in INI file) to change F/S to C/S or vice-versa. I think the C/S will be a little slower than F/S even if the server share the same machine as client. But my concerns are about the famous situation to drop suddenly a connection (that should never happen but...) I think C/S is more robust because if the connection is droped then the server will disconnect the session after a dead session period preserving the integrity specially in the indexes.Do you agree with that ? Thanks for share your opinion Jose Eduardo Helminsky |
Mon, Mar 16 2015 10:54 AM | Permanent Link |
Raul Team Elevate | On 3/16/2015 10:42 AM, Jose Eduardo Helminsky wrote:
> I think the C/S will be a little slower than F/S even if the server share the same machine as client. But my concerns are about the famous situation to drop suddenly a connection (that should never happen but...) I think C/S is more robust because if the connection is droped then the server will disconnect the session after a dead session period preserving the integrity specially in the indexes.Do you agree with that ? C/S might be bit slower but unless you process very large amounts of data i doubt users would notice. I would agree on the disconnect side - disconnects and windows TS possibly ending the session (and running app instance) would be better handled on C/S. Raul |
This web page was last updated on Friday, March 29, 2024 at 03:30 AM | Privacy PolicySite Map © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? E-mail us at info@elevatesoft.com |