Login ProductsSalesSupportDownloadsAbout |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM General » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 10 of 15 total |
ElevateDB and custom functions |
Thu, Feb 2 2006 8:01 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates Team Elevate | Tim
I'm thinking of creating a slew of custom function to give me "live filters" where more than one table is involved. Are custom filters changing much in ElevateDB? Roy Lambert |
Thu, Feb 2 2006 8:33 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Roy,
<< I'm thinking of creating a slew of custom function to give me "live filters" where more than one table is involved. Are custom filters changing much in ElevateDB? >> Yes. They can use PSM (stored procedure language) in ElevateDB and can also be externally defined as DLLs. It will be fairly easy to move the existing custom functions over to the DLL form, however. Think of a wrapper like the WebBroker (WebSnap) web modules. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Sun, Feb 5 2006 8:00 AM | Permanent Link |
Mauricio Campana Nonino | Tim Young
But it will be still possible to do custom functions directly in server source code, as I do now, correct? Mauricio Campana Nonino |
Mon, Feb 6 2006 11:56 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Mauricio,
<< But it will be still possible to do custom functions directly in server source code, as I do now, correct? >> Yes, and no. You will still be able to code custom functions in Delphi code, but they will reside in DLLs instead of directly in the server source code. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Mon, Feb 6 2006 2:30 PM | Permanent Link |
Eryk Bottomley | Tim,
> Yes, and no. You will still be able to code custom functions in Delphi > code, but they will reside in DLLs instead of directly in the server source > code. Eeeek!! Do you mean you're not going to be shipping the source to the server anymore? Eryk |
Tue, Feb 7 2006 5:33 AM | Permanent Link |
Mauricio Campana Nonino | Tim Young
<<Yes, and no. You will still be able to code custom functions in Delphi code, but they will reside in DLLs instead of directly in the server source code.>> Oh, that's too bad. I hate DLLs. Mauricio Campana Nonino |
Tue, Feb 7 2006 11:27 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Eryk,
<< Eeeek!! Do you mean you're not going to be shipping the source to the server anymore? >> No, we will still ship the source code to the server and it will still be customizable to some extent. However, custom functions are handled differently so that they are uniform across local and C/S usage in terms of the database catalog. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Tue, Feb 7 2006 11:28 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Mauricio,
<< Oh, that's too bad. I hate DLLs. >> As far as you're concerned, you won't even be able to tell the difference. There's a UI to the custom functions, so you implement them in Delphi in the same fashion as an event handler. The only additional task is that you have to ship some extra DLLs with your application. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Tue, Feb 7 2006 12:53 PM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates Team Elevate | Tim
If its possible I'd prefer not to have to ship any dll's just the .exe. My bet is that a lot of us will feel the same. Even so I'm fascinated about "a UI to the custom functions" - tell me more. Roy Lambert |
Tue, Feb 7 2006 2:10 PM | Permanent Link |
Eryk Bottomley | Tim,
> No, we will still ship the source code to the server and it will still be > customizable to some extent. However, custom functions are handled > differently so that they are uniform across local and C/S usage in terms of > the database catalog. Good, so long as the source is there things can be patched back the way they were where needed. If these really are DLLs (and not packages) then marshalling object references back and forth via virtual/abstract wrappers (or something similar) would be rather tiresome. Eryk |
Page 1 of 2 | Next Page » | |
Jump to Page: 1 2 |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 at 11:07 AM | Privacy PolicySite Map © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? E-mail us at info@elevatesoft.com |