Login ProductsSalesSupportDownloadsAbout |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM SQL » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 5 of 5 total |
ALTER TABLE vs tbl.Restructure |
Sat, Jul 8 2006 4:37 PM | Permanent Link |
Jerry Blumenthal | I need to make changes in a database, and I want to know if there are
any reasons I should work with SQL or with Restructure code. The changes I need to make are to add some fields, redefine the length of a few string fields, change the datatables' version numbers, and add a trivial degree of password protection. I should tell you at once that I am still using D4 and dbIsam 2.12. They're old, they dont have a lot of features I would like to have, but for my purposes they work well, and they have the major advantage of familiarity. I hope that you still are familiar with the old version and that I will still be able to get help here; this forum has been wonderful to me in the past. Jerry Blumenthal |
Sat, Jul 8 2006 11:11 PM | Permanent Link |
"Scott Martin" | Jerry,
I always use ALTER TABLE I have an app in place that has made many changes to the table and there has never been any problems. Quick, easy ... done deal. Regards, Scott. "Jerry Blumenthal" <jerry@blumenthalsoftware.com> wrote in message news:0227D798-76CA-4C29-93C0-BF84B2E1E108@news.elevatesoft.com... >I need to make changes in a database, and I want to know if there are any reasons I should work with SQL or with >Restructure code. > > The changes I need to make are to add some fields, redefine the length of a few string fields, change the datatables' > version numbers, and add a trivial degree of password protection. > > I should tell you at once that I am still using D4 and dbIsam 2.12. They're old, they dont have a lot of features I > would like to have, but for my purposes they work well, and they have the major advantage of familiarity. I hope that > you still are familiar with the old version and that I will still be able to get help here; this forum has been > wonderful to me in the past. > > Jerry Blumenthal |
Sun, Jul 9 2006 11:41 AM | Permanent Link |
"Robert" | "Scott Martin" <scottmartin@pdq.net> wrote in message news:C655C9F6-ED00-48C0-BD71-BC4798AC3487@news.elevatesoft.com... > Jerry, > > I always use ALTER TABLE > > I have an app in place that has made many changes to the table and there > has never been any problems. > Quick, easy ... done deal. > Plus SQL does not require recompilation of programs. I have a program to apply the upgrades: reads the SQL, ensures that you are in exclusive mode, does a backup, and applies the upgrade. You can use the same mechanism for "ALTER TABLE" or for cases where a customer table is messed up and needs to be fixed in place. All you need to send them is a small SQL file, that can usually be emailed as an attachment. Robert |
Sun, Jul 9 2006 1:03 PM | Permanent Link |
"Scott Martin" | *SLAP*, I could of have a V8 .....
That never crossed my mind.. to not compile it into the code and have it as a dynamic script! Guess what I will be doing next ... Regards, Scott > Plus SQL does not require recompilation of programs. I have a program to apply the upgrades: reads the SQL, ensures > that you are in exclusive mode, does a backup, and applies the upgrade. You can use the same mechanism for "ALTER > TABLE" or for cases where a customer table is messed up and needs to be fixed in place. All you need to send them is a > small SQL file, that can usually be emailed as an attachment. > > Robert > > > |
Wed, Jul 12 2006 8:35 AM | Permanent Link |
Jerry Blumenthal | Thanks to both of you. I appreciate it.
Jerry |
This web page was last updated on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 at 03:55 PM | Privacy PolicySite Map © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? E-mail us at info@elevatesoft.com |