Login ProductsSalesSupportDownloadsAbout |
Home » Technical Support » Elevate Web Builder Technical Support » Support Forums » Elevate Web Builder 2 Preview » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 10 of 10 total |
Opinions Regarding Splitting up the WebCtrls unit ?? |
Thu, Feb 5 2015 9:18 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit unwieldy,
and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. Any opinions ? Thanks, Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Feb 5 2015 11:33 AM | Permanent Link |
Mark Brooks Slikware | "Tim Young [Elevate Software]" wrote:
>>A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit unwieldy, >>and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such as WebEdits, >>WebContainers, etc. +1 |
Thu, Feb 5 2015 1:26 PM | Permanent Link |
Chris Holland SEC Solutions Ltd. Team Elevate | I think that is a good idea.
Chris Holland [Team Elevate] On 05/02/2015 14:18, Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote: > A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit > unwieldy, and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such > as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. > > Any opinions ? > > Thanks, > > Tim Young > Elevate Software > www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Feb 5 2015 4:11 PM | Permanent Link |
Steve Gill | << A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit unwieldy,
and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. >> Makes sense to me. = Steve |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 3:51 AM | Permanent Link |
Uli Becker | Tim,
> Any opinions ? Good idea - I like to clean up things Uli |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 3:55 AM | Permanent Link |
Matthew Jones | Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit > unwieldy, and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units > such as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. A good idea - I looked at printing to learn, and realised the files were full of stuff. I would also suggest you take an example of a complex component and put everything to do with it in a single unit, so it can be a sort of reference of "how to do something". People can then take your unit, rename it and the components, and not worry about duplicating something else. (Of course for a new from-scratch component you'd start with the simpler file, but this would be a good advanced "tutorial"). |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 4:58 AM | Permanent Link |
Rick | On 06/02/15 01:18, Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit > unwieldy, and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such > as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. > > Any opinions ? > If smaller units means less included in the resultant run-time which means better performance then sounds like a great idea! -- Rick |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 8:18 AM | Permanent Link |
Raul Team Elevate | On 2/5/2015 9:18 AM, Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> A quick survey for everyone. The WebCtrls unit is becoming a bit > unwieldy, and I'm considering splitting it up into multiple units such > as WebEdits, WebContainers, etc. > > Any opinions ? If you can split it up such a way that if one might not need all the units (depending on controls used in app) it won't even be included in javascript. Otherwise (or if compiler handles this anyway at code level) logical by function splitting as proposed makes sense. Raul |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 9:35 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Rick,
<< If smaller units means less included in the resultant run-time which means better performance then sounds like a great idea! >> No, it doesn't affect the resultant JS size. Only the referenced code affects that. Thanks, Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Fri, Feb 6 2015 9:36 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. timyoung@elevatesoft.com | Raul,
<< Otherwise (or if compiler handles this anyway at code level) logical by function splitting as proposed makes sense. >> The compiler handles this anyway. It's more a matter of making it easier on the developer looking for things and not having to wade though 10,000+ lines of code. Thanks, Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
This web page was last updated on Monday, April 29, 2024 at 05:23 AM | Privacy PolicySite Map © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? E-mail us at info@elevatesoft.com |