On 26/03/15 07:59, Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> Based upon our conversation here, I took some time yesterday to review
> the EWB 2 compiler's "strip out the unused code" functionality in the
> emitter portion of the compiler, and was able to improve upon it a bit
> more and trim off some more application code weight.

Tim, that's excellent! Thanks for your efforts here, very much
appreciated. This really is above and beyond when it comes to customer
support.

Sorry if I've distracted you from completing EWB2 but I'm now more than
ready to give you my money.

EWB1 has proven to be a very fast way of pumping out web applications
that perform very well. With the new layout support, ability to create
components and now the minimally larger foot print it looks as though
EWB2 will be way better.

--
Rick

Rick,

<< Sorry if I've distracted you from completing EWB2 but I'm now more than
ready to give you my money. >>

Always a good thing, and no, no distractions - I'm constantly trying to come
up with ways to compress the EWB applications as tightly as possible.

<< EWB1 has proven to be a very fast way of pumping out web applications
that perform very well. With the new layout support, ability to create
components and now the minimally larger foot print it looks as though EWB2
will be way better. >>

Yes, I'm hoping that we can grow the EWB ecosystem more now that developers
can easily create their own controls, as necessary.

Tim Young
Elevate Software
www.elevatesoft.com